Your sponsor has heard the same feasibility story from every bidder. Walk in with a different one: proven sites, the investigators who have enrolled trials like this one, and the patients they treat, counted. No ghost sites, no duplicates. Finished by our team in days, in your own template.
New to Quantum? Your first protocol is on us, no obligation. How it works
Not with a slicker deck or a longer site list. With an answer the sponsor can’t get from the CRO sitting across from you: proven sites, not registry noise.
The investigators who have actually enrolled trials like this one. The patients they treat, counted from real data, not inferred from registries and questionnaires. Every site verified and counted once, so no ghost sites or duplicates reach your sponsor. The reasoning behind every rank. Our team finishes it in days, in your own template, so you are not presenting another site list. You are showing the sponsor why your plan will enroll.
The whole industry crowds the same marquee centers, because that’s where the volume and the KOLs are obvious. We find the qualifying patients sitting in less-contested sites nobody has pitched yet, sometimes with more confidence than the crowded ones.
Where everyone goes
The same marquee academic centers, over and over. Contested, expensive, and slow to enroll.
The sites nobody pitched
Overlooked sites with real qualifying patients, and no one else pitching them.
Illustrative. Your competitors are all bidding the same crowded sites. The advantage is the patients they can’t see.
Everyone has the patients. The difference is knowing which sites are real. Trial registries list the same site in hundreds of ways, and a list built on that registry noise puts ghost sites and duplicates in front of your sponsor. Ours is verified and counted once, so when the sponsor asks how you know these sites will enroll, you have a number, not an estimate.
Your subscriptions show where trials have run and who looks strong on paper. They can’t tell you how many patients qualify under this protocol at each site, or whether the same site sits on your list twice under different names. That is the question a sponsor asks in the bid defense. Run our answer alongside the list you already have, as a second set of eyes before the room.
It compounds, all the way to the award.
Your feasibility team does not log into anything. You send the protocol, we do the work, and you walk into the room with the evidence. Here is what that looks like on one bid.
A short call about the bid. Then you send the protocol and the inclusion and exclusion criteria. That is the whole handoff.
How many patients actually qualify, counted from the real patient record, and the candidate sites that can reach them. Enough to build a proposal that says something your competitors cannot.
Every proposed site and investigator, the patients they actually treat, their record on trials like this one, and the reasoning behind each rank. Finished, in your own template.
When the sponsor asks how you know these sites will enroll, you have a number for each one and the investigator who will do it. That is usually where the conversation changes.
Every engagement starts the same way: a 20-minute call, then the protocol, then your answer in days. No software and no setup. Illustrative timeline; turnaround depends on the protocol.
Every CRO pays to chase work it may not win: feasibility hours, proposal writing, rehearsal, travel. We keep our share of that up front small. Most of what you pay us comes due when the award is yours. Project by project, no subscription required, and your first protocol with us is free.
If we have not worked together, book a 20-minute call about the next bid you are defending. We finish the first protocol on us. You get back the evidence a proposal needs, in days: the investigators who have enrolled trials like this one, the patients they actually treat, a reason for every site, and slides in your own template. No obligation.
For CROs new to Quantum. One protocol. Sponsor and site details stay confidential.
In a recent rare disease program, testing the protocol against the actual patient population nearly tripled the eligible pool. It then became a ranked site list the team could take straight into a bid defense.
How does this fit into our RFP and bid defense process?
It sits alongside it. For an RFP, you get a fast feasibility read to build the proposal on. For the bid defense, you get the full site-by-site answer: qualifying patient counts, named investigators with a measured track record, and the reasoning behind every rank. Your feasibility team stays in charge of the bid. Clinical trial feasibility →
What do we actually get back?
Slides in your own template: the proposed sites, the investigators behind them and their record on trials like this one, the patients each one actually treats, counted from real data, and the reasoning behind every rank. Ready to present in your name.
Is the first protocol really free?
Yes, if we have not worked together. Book a 20-minute call about the next bid you are defending, and our team finishes the first protocol on us, the same way as any engagement, in your own template. Take it into the sponsor meeting. If it proves itself, we talk about the next one. If it does not, you owe us nothing. Book a call →
Do we pay before we know if we have won?
Only a small part. You already fund your own bid defense, so we built a model where most of the cost lands when you win the award. Each project is quoted on the call, with no subscription required, and your first protocol with us is free.
Will the sponsor know we worked with you?
That is your call. The deliverable is yours to present in your own name, and the evidence stands on its own in the room. We stay in the background.
We already have a feasibility team and our own data. Why add you?
Because most feasibility teams run on the same registry noise your competitors run on: registries, past trial counts and site questionnaires, all inferred. We count from the real, patient-level record, so the sponsor hears a different answer from you. You can also use us as a second set of eyes on a list you have already built. Why patient-level data beats inferred →
How is this different from the trial databases we subscribe to?
Those tell you who has run trials before and who looks strong on paper. They cannot tell you how many patients at a given site actually qualify under this protocol, or whether the same site appears more than once under different names. We answer both, and we pair it with the investigator’s real enrollment history, so every site comes with both the patients and the investigator to enroll them. How the ranking works →
How does an engagement start?
With a 20-minute call about the bid. Then you send the protocol and the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and our team comes back with the answer in days, in your own template. No software to install and nothing for your team to learn.
What is a ghost site?
A ghost site is a site that exists in the data but not in reality: a duplicate name, a closed department or an outdated address. Ghost sites inflate site lists and waste outreach. Every site on a Quantum Research Cloud shortlist is verified and counted once. Why big site counts mislead →
How fast can you turn around a live bid?
Days. Once we have the protocol or the RFP, we come back with the counted patients, the sites that can reach them, and the reasoning. No software to install and nothing for your team to learn. Book a call →
What real-world data is behind your answers?
Real, de-identified, patient-level real-world data, complete and longitudinal. As the verified site intelligence company, we do not just hand you raw data. Our team turns it into the finished answer for each protocol: counted qualifying patients, a ranked and explained site shortlist and the investigators behind it, ready for the RFP or the bid defense.
A 20-minute call, then your protocol, then the answer in days: slides in your own template, every site verified and explained. New to Quantum? Your first protocol is on us.